廉政文化研究

推动基层纪检监察组织力量下沉与村务监督委员会有效衔接，已成为完善基层监督体系、持续释放基层监督治理效能不可或缺的重要构成。监督下沉的体制依赖性强，权变因素较多，当一种规范化、标准化、强制性的监督力量嵌入乡村基层治理中，将不可避免地对原有的治理结构产生挤压和碰撞，导致整体性治理观念薄弱、监督渠道不畅通、复杂治理环境的适应困境、干部能力作风不强等问题因素被放大，对乡村监督治理的提质增效产生了不利影响。监督下沉应该以权力互动为起点、以制度支撑为保障、以行动主体为承接，重点解决好三大张力关系：一是党内监督专责机关的纪法属性与村委会的群众自治属性之间的张力；二是基层监督力量不足与监督对象规模扩大之间的张力；三是纪检监察权的政治属性与村民自治权的社会属性之间的张力。同时，为了减少二者间的衔接不畅，应从嵌入基层治理网格、织密基层监督网络、打造智慧监督平台、开展“室组地”联动、优化整合监督队伍入手，推动基层“监督之制”向“监督之治”转化。

Promoting the integration of basic-level discipline inspection and supervision organizations with village affairs supervision committees has become an indispensable component in improving the basic-level supervision system and continuously enhancing the efficiency of basic-level supervision. The effectiveness of extending supervision to the basic-level is highly dependent on institutional frameworks and is influenced by numerous contingent factors. When a standardized and authoritative supervisory force is embedded within rural basic-level governance, it inevitably imposes pressure and friction with the existing governance structure, laying more requirements on basic-level governance capabilities, magnifying such issues as weak holistic governance awareness, obstructed supervision channels, difficulties in adapting to complex governance environments, and insufficient competence and professionalism among cadres, negatively affecting the quality and efficiency of rural supervision governance. This integration process, starting with power interaction, sustained by institutional support, carried out by active agents, involves handling the relationship between three major tensions: Firstly, the tension between the legal and disciplinary nature of the Party's dedicated supervisory bodies and the autonomous nature of village committees. Secondly, the tension between the limited capacity of basic-level supervisory forces and the expanding scope of supervision targets. Thirdly, the tension between the political nature of disciplinary inspection power and the societal nature of autonomous authority. To improve coordination and reduce friction, measures can be taken such as embedding supervision within basic-level governance grids, tightening the supervision network, building digital supervision platforms, carrying out coordinated efforts through office-group-local collaboration, and optimizing the supervisory workforce. These steps will help transform basic-level supervision as an institution into effective supervision as a form of governance.